| Author |
 Topic  |
|
|
shinybeans
Average Member
110 Posts |
 Posted - 23 Jun 2012 : 09:31:07
|
| Does anyone know what is happening to this building? It has been stripped down to it's timbers. Was concerned to see a 'demolition' sign, thought they were lisetd? |
|
|
JudieT
Senior Member
United Kingdom
612 Posts |
Posted - 23 Jun 2012 : 15:04:37
|
| They are listed, it's being 'developed'. |
 |
|
|
shinybeans
Average Member
110 Posts |
Posted - 25 Jun 2012 : 11:58:33
|
| Ok, thanks - better than them being empty |
|
|
|
sexy doughnuts
Average Member
United Kingdom
313 Posts |
Posted - 24 Jul 2012 : 12:15:01
|
One of the Maltings Cowl's on the floor - Did it jump or was it pushed? 
Image Insert:
99.79 KB |
|
|
|
ian.ball
WoLFer & Moderator
United Kingdom
2785 Posts |
Posted - 24 Jul 2012 : 15:05:39
|
| Planning permission was applied for some time ago for flats/apartments and I believe it was granted with the proviso that the existing features must be kept where possible. |
|
|
|
JudieT
Senior Member
United Kingdom
612 Posts |
Posted - 24 Jul 2012 : 21:05:11
|
quote:
Originally posted by ian.ball
Planning permission was applied for some time ago for flats/apartments and I believe it was granted with the proviso that the existing features must be kept where possible.
Ha ha - is that the features should be kept somewhere where it's possible - like on the floor?  |
|
|
|
shinybeans
Average Member
110 Posts |
Posted - 25 Jul 2012 : 13:53:25
|
| Hopefully its just temporary while the roof is repaired - otherwise planning dept need to see that photo... |
|
|
|
skippy
Advanced Member
1019 Posts |
Posted - 25 Jul 2012 : 23:28:33
|
come on... Just the usual negative slant on the forum again?
If they are working on the roof structure, it stands to reason that they need to remove the cowls.
The image shows it down on the floor, undamaged and ready to be put back up when needed.
If it were to have been disposed of, it stands to reason that they would have smashed it in situ and not taken the time to have it lowered to the floor.
Just look at the other areas where the old maltings were turned into houses, at least the time is being taken to keep the external look in place where they have been done.
|
Edited by - skippy on 25 Jul 2012 23:31:49 |
|
|
|
JudieT
Senior Member
United Kingdom
612 Posts |
Posted - 26 Jul 2012 : 12:10:22
|
quote:
Originally posted by skippy
come on... Just the usual negative slant on the forum again?
Sorry didn't mean to be negative, was just a joke!  |
|
|
|
Scottman
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
1758 Posts |
Posted - 26 Jul 2012 : 12:31:46
|
quote:
Originally posted by skippy
come on... Just the usual negative slant on the forum again?
If they are working on the roof structure, it stands to reason that they need to remove the cowls.
The image shows it down on the floor, undamaged and ready to be put back up when needed.
If it were to have been disposed of, it stands to reason that they would have smashed it in situ and not taken the time to have it lowered to the floor.
Just look at the other areas where the old maltings were turned into houses, at least the time is being taken to keep the external look in place where they have been done.
Like |
|
|
| |
Topic |
|
old malting in New Rd
