quote:

---

Originally posted by RichardH

I suspect Warewolf means they've posted on their wall on Facebook about it to let their friends know and to encourage them to submit responses as well.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by WickenMan

In an e-mail to us from Biffa dated 16th June 2012 from Jeff Rhodes, Company Planning & Permitting Manager, Biffa Group has said:

“[I]t is the quarrying rate which dictates the infill/restoration rate and, ultimately, its completion, not the other way around. In basic terms, we cannot fill a hole which has not yet been dug and once it is dug we are required under the planning consent to fill it and restore it, in accordance with approved restoration contours and scheme. ... Cemex will be applying to extend the quarrying end date because they will not have completed the quarrying by the 2015 quarrying end date. Consequently, neither can the required infilling and restoration scheme be completed by the 2017 date.”

---

quote:

---

18 02 03: animal carcasses, animal faeces, soiled animal bedding, vermin, soiled dressings and swabs, animal tissue

18 01 04: used stoma bags, hospital domestic waste, used incontinence pads, microbiological waste, infectious linen, infectious materials, used nappies

20 01 99: feminine hygiene waste from shops and offices, dog faeces from collection bins, sharps waste, tattooing & body piercing and substance abuse

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by WickenMan

In an e-mail to us from Biffa dated 16th June 2012 from Jeff Rhodes, Company Planning & Permitting Manager, Biffa Group has said:

“[I]t is the quarrying rate which dictates the infill/restoration rate and, ultimately, its completion, not the other way around. In basic terms, we cannot fill a hole which has not yet been dug and once it is dug we are required under the planning consent to fill it and restore it, in accordance with approved restoration contours and scheme. ... Cemex will be applying to extend the quarrying end date because they will not have completed the quarrying by the 2015 quarrying end date. Consequently, neither can the required infilling and restoration scheme be completed by the 2017 date.”

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by WickenMan

Cemex lose profits. Biffa loses profits. Maybe they don't see this as a win win situation.

---

quote:

---

I wasn't considering Biffa's feelings/profits when I posted
If they can't organise their hole digging and gravel extraction in the time that has been given to them to allow them to fulfil their obligation to restore the site by 2017 then TOUGH!

---

quote:

---

If they can't organise their hole digging and gravel extraction in the time that has been given to them to allow them to fulfil their obligation to restore the site by 2017 then TOUGH!

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Wareite1969

quote:

---

If they can't organise their hole digging and gravel extraction in the time that has been given to them to allow them to fulfil their obligation to restore the site by 2017 then TOUGH!

---

It's Cemex that dig the site not Biffa. According to the earlier post they are applying for an extension to their time on site also. If you feel we should take the 'you're out of time so TOUGH' approach then you are also happy leaving behind the aggregates that haven't been dug. This will impact future infrastructure / building costs.

The site is a very complex balance between the Aggregate company and it's market place versus Biffa and it's local responsibilities. That is why we need to make sure we are fighting the right battle for everyone and I feel the most important one is the extension of waste types.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Scottman

Sorry but I don't see this as any concern of the long suffering residents of Ware. Planning permission was given for
extraction of materials for a defined length of time, and filling of the resultant holes for another defined period of time. The activities then stop.

---