Commons Debate on West Anglia Trains
Posted: Fri 13 Dec 2013 6:19 am
http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/? ... isk#g323.0
If you follow the link you will find a short debate on the West Anglia line in which Mark Prisk spoke. He was robust in his defence of the need for improvements to the main line, but didn't speak about our little branch line. The Minister who spoke did mention our line, asserting that we have a much better service than before privatisation when the trains were never punctual.
My memory is that we used to have twice as many trains as now, four each way per hour during the week, and that their punctuality was no worse than it is now. Plus the station was staffed every day and was less run down. But perhaps I'm just looking at it through rose-tinted glasses. No-one came back to the minister in the debate on reliability, punctuality and service levels.
The Minister did talk about line improvements at the southern end of the line, including adding extra tracks, but nothing at our end of the Lea Valley.
If you follow the link you will find a short debate on the West Anglia line in which Mark Prisk spoke. He was robust in his defence of the need for improvements to the main line, but didn't speak about our little branch line. The Minister who spoke did mention our line, asserting that we have a much better service than before privatisation when the trains were never punctual.
My memory is that we used to have twice as many trains as now, four each way per hour during the week, and that their punctuality was no worse than it is now. Plus the station was staffed every day and was less run down. But perhaps I'm just looking at it through rose-tinted glasses. No-one came back to the minister in the debate on reliability, punctuality and service levels.
The Minister did talk about line improvements at the southern end of the line, including adding extra tracks, but nothing at our end of the Lea Valley.